The majority of listed companies in the Netherlands provide insight into the part of their business activities that has a major impact on the climate. According to European taxonomy regulations, these companies must classify this according to the same green language. However, the way this is done varies greatly. As a result, comparisons of the efforts of Dutch companies on the climate are hardly possible anymore. This is stated in the KPMG report ‘Sets the starting point for transparency ‘ where listed companies are measured for the first time in relation to the European taxonomy legislation and regulation introduced in July 2020, which these organizations must comply with.
Making buildings more sustainable, investing in sustainable energy production and educating farmers to protect their crops from climate change; These are just a few examples of business activities that the EU identifies as efforts that can make a significant contribution to climate protection or adaptation to climate change. Last year, large Dutch listed companies were to publish an EU taxonomy climate report for the first time.
14 of the 34 listed companies surveyed realize part of their turnover with potentially climate-friendly activities in accordance with the taxonomy regulation. 23 companies are investing in this domain. At the same time, a third of companies do not explicitly state in their annual reports which activities fall under the taxonomy rules. 15 companies use the terminology from the regulation. The other organizations provide their own interpretation of their taxonomy reporting. Only six companies report specifically which environmental goal they contribute to. The length of taxonomy reports also varies considerably. From 241 words to over 3000 words. However, this is not an indication of the quality of reporting, because companies also describe what the EU taxonomy means without providing comprehensive insight into the results. Also the explanation for the calculation of the results is often missing.
What is also striking is that the majority of listed companies do not link EU taxonomy reports and their Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) strategy to a fully sustainable business operation. Only seven of the 34 companies describe in their annual report how the sustainability efforts comply with the rules. As a result, compliance with laws and regulations seems to be the main motive for the taxonomy reports.
“Our research shows that the new European taxonomy regulation is still difficult for many companies to implement. The willingness to report along the lines of the green language is there. At the same time, the search for the right data and the interpretation of laws and regulations is still a major challenge for many organizations. This ensures that every company interprets the EU taxonomy in its own way. This means that it is hardly possible to compare the efforts for the climate among listed companies. There is a great need for more clarity, so that the EU taxonomy becomes an effective tool for stimulating activities that contribute to climate protection, ”says Gijs de Graaff, Director Accounting Advice at KPMG.
About EU taxonomy
The EU Taxonomy Regulation was created to support the transition to a climate-neutral Europe by allowing more capital to flow into sustainable activities. The regulation aims to increase transparency about sustainable business investments in order to both prevent greenwashing and provide society with reliable insight into the size of sustainable activities as part of companies’ turnover, capital and operating expenses.
Listed companies with more than 500 employees must indicate which part of their activities contributes to preventing or adapting to climate change. These European rules came into force in July 2020 and are constantly being expanded. From next year, for example, it must be added which part of the effort promotes the circular economy, prevents pollution or protects and restores biodiversity. Sustainable use and protection of water and other maritime resources are also covered by the Taxonomy Regulation.
About the research
With the launch of this report, KPMG provides for the first time insight into the Netherlands in the number of listed companies that know what part of their turnover and investments have an impact on the climate. For example, in recent months KPMG has examined and compared annual reports for 34 listed companies such as Akzo, ASML, Heineken, Ahold, DSM, KPN, Philips, PostNL, Vopak, Boskalis, BAM, TomTom and Nedap to assess the extent to which the EU the taxonomy provisions have been complied with. The complete list of the 34 companies surveyed has been added to the KPMG report.